May
19
Monday Muse: What is Charismatic? #mondaymuse
Posted on May 19th, 2009 in Faith, Monday Muse by Fred McKinnon
OK – so, it’s Monday Muse … on Tuesday. (just couldn’t make this happen yesterday)
I’d like to know – what do you think of when you hear the word “charismatic”, specifically, in the context of religion?
Related posts:
20 Responses to “Monday Muse: What is Charismatic? #mondaymuse”
Would you join in the discussion? Checkout the responses below, and click "reply" to reply to someone's comment, or scroll all the way to the bottom of the page to leave your own comment in the box!
I think of two things:
1. people who are crazy-passionate about Jesus.
2. people who use spiritual gifts improperly.
(A little good and a little bad.)
The term “Charismatic Movement” is sometimes confused with the term “charismatic.” The word “charismatic” is an umbrella term used to describe those Christians who believe that the manifestations of the Holy Spirit seen in the first century Christian church (see e.g. the book of Acts ), such as miracles, prophecy, and glossolalia (speaking in other tongues or languages), are available to contemporary Christians and may be experienced and practiced today. It is derived from the Greek word χάρισμα (“gift,” itself derived from χάρις, “grace” or “favor”) which is the term used in the Bible, 1 Corinthians 12-14. “Charismatic Movement,” however, expresses the arrival of spiritual gifts in the historic mainline denominations.
From wiki. I think that’s a good differentiation.
I like this answer. When I hear the word, charismatic, i think of the 80s-90s (i grew up in a charismatic church). i know there are churches that are “charismatic, but it seems that the word isn’t used as much because it does have a negative vibe, ie the crazy church, worship trains (dancing around the church in a train like motion), holy rollers.
i think we need to identify ourselves as people who are passionate about jesus and who are free to worship in many forms.
I actually take issue with a broad sweeping labeling of “charismatics” as “those who use spiritual gifts improperly” (comment #1).
Because if we’re honest, EVERYONE, every denomination, every group of people that have an established set of doctrines at one point in the timeline of their existence has included improper use of the gifts of the Spirit.
Not just charismatics.
The word makes me a little nervous…
It always reminds me of the term Mickey Rodriguez used often…”Charasmaniacs”
Sometimes it was a positive reference, and sometimes…not so much!
Expressive, lively, uninhibited worshippers…
that’s the positive in my own experience and the negative for me, is that often times those worshipers can become so focused on the experiences that they lose focus on God. I grew up in a charismatic church and it was easier to be a sign seeker than a God seeker.
I still embrace the gifts fully but have learned to seek first His face, not His hand.
Well said!
Powerful.
That’s how I look at it. I would consider myself more Pentecostal than Charismatic, although I realize that the line is blurred more and more. But the comments really apply to both.
Operating in the gifts of the Holy Spirit gives the believer power, not only over their own lives, but over everything around them. Learning to discern what is God-given and what is not opens many doors in life and in ministry.
Well, the word “Charism” means “grace gift”, and adding “-atic” to it means that one “possess the quality of”… so, when I think of “Charismatic” I think of that very thing: One or a gathering of ones who possess or walk in the qualities of the grace gifts – ie., folks who are open to, and walk in, the gifts God has given them.
New blog post: Monday Muse: What is Charismatic? #mondaymuse http://bit.ly/19dxCu
#mondaymuse (on Tuesday) – What do you think of when you hear the word “charismatic” in a religious context? http://bit.ly/15Zd9F
When dealing with people who wouldn’t get all the nuances anyway, I simply say, “People who don’t put limits on what we can ask God for, and don’t put limits on what he can do.”
A lot of us were part of the “movement” in previous years, and I’m told a good book that I’ve bought but haven’t started yet is Post Charismatic by Rob MacAlpine.
I tend to think of people who more likely to speak in tongues, prophesy, dance in the aisles, etc… than your average Baptist. More expressive worship?
I’m with Jen Kerr. Nervous. Apprehensive. All guards up.
Why?
When I hear the term I too feel uncomfortable. I think of an overemphasis on the spirit apart from truth. I think it started as a good thing, but much like many movements has forgotten its roots. Charismatic worship is definitely not a bad thing, but it must be based on the Gospel. If people are dancing in the aisles or falling on the floor weeping because the truth of the Gospel – that while they were still lost in their sin God became flesh and took their sins, suffered and died on their behalf – suddenly becomes extremely real to them, then as a worship leader I am excited. Unfortunately we in the non-charismatic churches have become so scared that we’re going to go to far down that path that we’ve removed any type of emotion from our worship services. If we are singing and hearing the Gospel preached then how can we help but be moved emotionally?
Great conversation so far! I’ve always “defined” charasmatic as “one who shows great charisma for God”. I appreciate the greek definition, for it alone causes me to wonder how anyone can read it and not want all it contains. The word (today) makes me feel a little sad becuase of the way that the word is reacted to in the main-stream church today. Yes, the gifts have been abused. Yes, people have sought and seek the gifts above the giver. Yes, many have allowed their “liberty” to be a stumbling block. Yes, many who operate in the gifts “look down” on those who don’t. There are so many negatives, and they are seen more than the positives in too many arenas. I got saved in the charasmatic movement, and have been in it up to three years ago. Now that I’m in a “baptist-oriented” environment, I miss the gifts flowing, but not in the way I was used to. I am thankful that I have been “out” of the charasmatic arena for the sole reason that I have a clearer view of what’s right and wrong. I believe now that God wants to restore it back to the church in a right fashion. I only hope the fruits, nuts and flakes out there (I used to be one) haven’t ruined that chance.
I too grew up with a charismatic/pentecostal church background. I like what Russ and Heather have said in their comments.
I can see why some people might be nervous. I’ve had my share of bad experiences also where things became experience driven.
As Heather says we should be first and foremost seekers of God but be open to the Holy Spirit and the gifts.
People these days are leaving the traditional church and seeking the supernatural in other religions because most of us are too afraid to venture there.
When I hear the word “charismatic”, all sorts of things go through my mind. My ex wife became a charismatic while we were married and proceeded to inject a bizzare dynamic into our marriage. Constantly babbling in what she called tongues, engaging in strange behavior, and becoming very selfish about it. she once described it to me as “too hocus pocus”. it was a living insanity with things floating in the air, lightning bolts in church and some of the most ridiculous of prophecies. blessings wrapped in toilet paper, for example
I for one do not believe that God has to do any of these things to prove that he is.
the mere fact that “tongues” are a sign of the baptism of the holy spirit, directly contradicts what is said about it in the bible. no longer is it a sign to the unbeliever, as scripture states it is,,it is now proof to the believers in the church that you attend that you’re really saved.
needless to say, it destroyed our family